The future of User Interfaces
June 6th, 2010 by calin
I recently watched John Underkoffler speaking on TED (Thanks Marius) and exemplifying its vision on the future of User Interfaces. It made me realize that the user interface components are almost ready for deployment in projects. The only unknown is when they will become mainstream. There are two crucial aspects in this, one is technical, the other one social and how user behavior can change.
The user interface elements have applications that work and are already marginally used or soon to be released.
I have actually experienced the multi-touch technology, using a project developed at The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, and one of my friends was part of the team. The project is called “A Multi-touch Collaborative Solution for Measurement Data Visualization”. I tested it with a fun application, a pile of digital images on the surface table. There were three of us at the same time, manipulating, moving and zooming individual photos on the same table. It’s fun! Then, of course there is the more known and ready to ship Microsoft Surface.
Look at Project Natal Kinect. It will allow players to interact without any controller at all.
Technically, all we need are projects, real-world applications that combine more of these technologies into something that can be used for a purpose. And fun can be one purpose. I am more curious of user adoption. And I will assume it will become mainstream price, not 15.000 bucks for a Microsoft Surface table. Just imagine a multi-touch monitor or TV that you can also place horizontally with some accessory kit and have multi-touch table in your home or business location.
Do you remember when we were enjoying watching Sci-Fi movies where actors interacted via Voice Commands? It’s all here now. But do we use this feature? I remember playing with voice commands in Vista’s beta and never used it since. And it actually worked. I have a decent phone, but not a powerful Smartphone, that does have voice recognition capabilities that is very useful in a particular situation. When I drive, I just push the button on my Bluetooth headset, say the name, and the phone matches the name from my address book and dials. And I mean voice recognition, not matching pre-recorded voice labels. So, all computers and most phones have voice recognition capabilities. How many of you use them? Or how many people you know who interact with their PCs via voice? I assume few to none.
All that said, my curiosity is when these types of interaction will be used, even after they become mainstream and standard capabilities. What do you think?
In John Underkoffler’s demo computers and network devices are supposed to be space aware. Notice the movement of elements from one device to another. That is the part that is completely new to me in a real demo and I am looking forward to see that working. Just look at the implications. You need a real interaction between location, user input, user interface and the network. That means that when a packet is sent in your network it will have some information on the physical location of the destination address. And It’s the only way I can imagine, but haven’t found any info on that on MIT Tangible Media Group website. Please send any info on such projects.
Just imagine having the device that will interact with this new User Interfaces and network equipment in your office to add that level of interaction between colleagues. Or beyond that, through the Internet. Just imagine a standard that will aid you carry location information just like VoIP packets transport voice through the Internet.
The future looks bright and fun!
Posted in All Trends, Fun, General, Microsoft |
No Comments »










via 









Today I rediscovered my Apple remote and although it’s based on shitty IR technology (will never grasp why they didn’t use the darn iSight as a sensor) I have to credit it as the coolest and most desirable wireless gadget in my geekdom.










